Two runs touch the same session, the second write silently erases the first, and the agent keeps answering with total confidence from stale state. Nothing crashed and the model did not hallucinate, so this is a harness failure, the kind that lives in the system around the model rather than in the weights.
Your Agent Didn't Fail. Your Harness Did. — Vinoth Govindarajan, OpenAI
Related research
More curated notes connected through AI Engineering and Model Evaluation.
OpenAI’s Frontier Governance Framework
OpenAI's 22-page Frontier Governance Framework maps its frontier-model processes to California's Transparency in Frontier AI Act and the EU AI Act's general-purpose AI code. It documents lifecycle risk assessment, cyber-offense and other risk tiers, mitigation and residual-risk decisions, critical-incident handling, security risk management, model reporting, external review, responsibility allocation, and change control.
Cybersecurity in the Intelligence Age
OpenAI proposes a five-pillar strategy for AI-enabled cyber defense: tiered access for trusted defenders, faster government-industry coordination, stronger protection of frontier models and infrastructure, risk-scaled deployment monitoring, and broader defensive support for individuals and small organizations.
A five-step roadmap to closing the AI evaluation gap
The roadmap addresses evaluation results that overstate real-world performance or fail to transfer across deployment contexts. Its five steps balance standardized and local tests, evaluate throughout the lifecycle, build qualified assurance and communication capacity, tailor tests to each value-chain actor and technology, and use a coordinated, trusted process for updating methods.