AI Red Team Engineering notes, research references, and field notes on AI systems, responsible AI, governance, and compliance.
Global search

Search AI Red Team

Search across the complete knowledge base.

Enter at least two characters to begin.
↑↓ select Enter open Browse the full research archive
USENIX Association · Event date August 12, 2026 - August 14, 2026

USENIX Security '26

event upcoming AI Red TeamingAdversarial MLAgent Security
Why it matters
August 12, 2026 - August 14, 2026
Scheduled event

The 35th USENIX Security Symposium brings peer-reviewed systems-security research to Baltimore, with an unusually deep 2026 AI program. Dedicated ML-security sessions cover real-world and indirect prompt injection, adaptive jailbreak attacks, agent memory and resource-abuse failures, LLM privacy and backdoors, and a systematization of agent attacks and defenses; proceedings are open access.

My takeaway: Use the program as a source of threat models and reproducible artifacts, not a list of mitigations to copy blindly. Compare each paper's attacker access, model and tool assumptions, baselines, adaptive evaluation, and deployment realism, then turn applicable attacks into local regression tests.
Keep exploring

More curated notes connected through AI Red Teaming and Adversarial ML.

OpenAI News · framework

OpenAI’s Frontier Governance Framework

OpenAI's 22-page Frontier Governance Framework maps its frontier-model processes to California's Transparency in Frontier AI Act and the EU AI Act's general-purpose AI code. It documents lifecycle risk assessment, cyber-offense and other risk tiers, mitigation and residual-risk decisions, critical-incident handling, security risk management, model reporting, external review, responsibility allocation, and change control.

OWASP GenAI Security Project · guide

OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications for 2026

OWASP's community guide organizes agentic-system risk into ten categories, including goal hijacking, tool misuse, identity and privilege abuse, memory poisoning, insecure inter-agent communication, cascading failures, and rogue-agent behavior. It provides a shared taxonomy and mitigation starting point rather than a certification checklist or evidence that a deployed system is secure.

OECD.AI Wonk · guide

A five-step roadmap to closing the AI evaluation gap

The roadmap addresses evaluation results that overstate real-world performance or fail to transfer across deployment contexts. Its five steps balance standardized and local tests, evaluate throughout the lifecycle, build qualified assurance and communication capacity, tailor tests to each value-chain actor and technology, and use a coordinated, trusted process for updating methods.