AI Red Team Engineering notes, research references, and field notes on AI systems, responsible AI, governance, and compliance.
Global search

Search AI Red Team

Search across the complete knowledge base.

Enter at least two characters to begin.
↑↓ select Enter open Browse the full research archive
NVIDIA AI Red Team · January 28, 2026

Updating Classifier Evasion for Vision Language Models

analysis AI Red TeamingAgent SecurityPrompt Injection
Why it matters

NVIDIA demonstrates gradient-based attacks against a PaliGemma2 vision-language classifier, including imperceptible perturbations and localized patches that change a stop-sign decision or force an arbitrary output token. It also explains why physical attacks require transformations that model changes in scale, angle, lighting, and capture conditions.

My takeaway: Threat-model images and image regions as adversarial input, test both digital perturbations and expectation-over-transformation patches, and evaluate the downstream action—not only classifier accuracy. Safety-critical systems need sensor or model cross-checks and must not let one VLM output directly authorize an irreversible action.
Keep exploring

More curated notes connected through AI Red Teaming and Agent Security.

OpenAI News · framework

OpenAI’s Frontier Governance Framework

OpenAI's 22-page Frontier Governance Framework maps its frontier-model processes to California's Transparency in Frontier AI Act and the EU AI Act's general-purpose AI code. It documents lifecycle risk assessment, cyber-offense and other risk tiers, mitigation and residual-risk decisions, critical-incident handling, security risk management, model reporting, external review, responsibility allocation, and change control.

OWASP GenAI Security Project · guide

OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications for 2026

OWASP's community guide organizes agentic-system risk into ten categories, including goal hijacking, tool misuse, identity and privilege abuse, memory poisoning, insecure inter-agent communication, cascading failures, and rogue-agent behavior. It provides a shared taxonomy and mitigation starting point rather than a certification checklist or evidence that a deployed system is secure.

OECD.AI Wonk · guide

A five-step roadmap to closing the AI evaluation gap

The roadmap addresses evaluation results that overstate real-world performance or fail to transfer across deployment contexts. Its five steps balance standardized and local tests, evaluate throughout the lifecycle, build qualified assurance and communication capacity, tailor tests to each value-chain actor and technology, and use a coordinated, trusted process for updating methods.