AI Red Team Engineering notes, research references, and field notes on AI systems, responsible AI, governance, and compliance.
Global search

Search AI Red Team

Search across the complete knowledge base.

Enter at least two characters to begin.
↑↓ select Enter open Browse the full research archive
Adversa AI Trusted AI Blog · May 26, 2026

SymJack: the approval prompt is lying to you. A symlink-hijack RCE in six AI coding agents

analysis Adversarial MLAI Red TeamingModel Evaluation
Why it matters

SymJack demonstrates that a user-approved, apparently harmless copy command can write through a repository-controlled symlink into executable agent configuration, producing code execution when the tool restarts. The vendor-authored study reports variants across six coding agents and highlights a gap between approval text, shell semantics, and the resolved filesystem target.

My takeaway: Before approval and execution, resolve symlinks and canonicalize every destination, then apply the same write policy to shell commands as native file tools. Block project content from modifying agent or MCP configuration, scan cloned repositories for links, and isolate unattended CI agents from credentials and production networks.
Keep exploring

More curated notes connected through Adversarial ML and AI Red Teaming.

OpenAI News · framework

OpenAI’s Frontier Governance Framework

OpenAI's 22-page Frontier Governance Framework maps its frontier-model processes to California's Transparency in Frontier AI Act and the EU AI Act's general-purpose AI code. It documents lifecycle risk assessment, cyber-offense and other risk tiers, mitigation and residual-risk decisions, critical-incident handling, security risk management, model reporting, external review, responsibility allocation, and change control.

OWASP GenAI Security Project · guide

OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications for 2026

OWASP's community guide organizes agentic-system risk into ten categories, including goal hijacking, tool misuse, identity and privilege abuse, memory poisoning, insecure inter-agent communication, cascading failures, and rogue-agent behavior. It provides a shared taxonomy and mitigation starting point rather than a certification checklist or evidence that a deployed system is secure.

OECD.AI Wonk · guide

A five-step roadmap to closing the AI evaluation gap

The roadmap addresses evaluation results that overstate real-world performance or fail to transfer across deployment contexts. Its five steps balance standardized and local tests, evaluate throughout the lifecycle, build qualified assurance and communication capacity, tailor tests to each value-chain actor and technology, and use a coordinated, trusted process for updating methods.