CAMLIS / PMLR · November 14, 2025

RIG-RAG: A Graph-Inspired Approach to Agentic Cloud Infrastructure

video Agent Security AI Engineering Model Evaluation

RIG-RAG: A Graph-Inspired Approach to Agentic Cloud Infrastructure video thumbnail

Why it matters

RIG-RAG converts changing cloud configuration data into a typed, security-enriched graph for natural-language investigation and scheduled oversight. The authors report a production AWS deployment supporting 300,000 users, with interactive queries for analysts and curated recurring questions that detect infrastructure drift and expose relationships such as public reachability and identity access.

My takeaway: Keep collected configuration facts, inferred relationships, and model explanations separately attributable and reproducible. Run a versioned library of security questions on every graph refresh, require evidence paths for each answer, compare results against deterministic cloud-policy checks, constrain the assistant to read-only access, and route consequential changes through reviewed automation.

Keep exploring

More curated notes connected through Agent Security and AI Engineering.

OpenAI News · framework

OpenAI’s Frontier Governance Framework

OpenAI's 22-page Frontier Governance Framework maps its frontier-model processes to California's Transparency in Frontier AI Act and the EU AI Act's general-purpose AI code. It documents lifecycle risk assessment, cyber-offense and other risk tiers, mitigation and residual-risk decisions, critical-incident handling, security risk management, model reporting, external review, responsibility allocation, and change control.

OWASP GenAI Security Project · guide

OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications for 2026

OWASP's community guide organizes agentic-system risk into ten categories, including goal hijacking, tool misuse, identity and privilege abuse, memory poisoning, insecure inter-agent communication, cascading failures, and rogue-agent behavior. It provides a shared taxonomy and mitigation starting point rather than a certification checklist or evidence that a deployed system is secure.

OECD.AI Wonk · guide

A five-step roadmap to closing the AI evaluation gap

The roadmap addresses evaluation results that overstate real-world performance or fail to transfer across deployment contexts. Its five steps balance standardized and local tests, evaluate throughout the lifecycle, build qualified assurance and communication capacity, tailor tests to each value-chain actor and technology, and use a coordinated, trusted process for updating methods.