AI Red Team Engineering notes, research references, and field notes on AI systems, responsible AI, governance, and compliance.
Global search

Search AI Red Team

Search across the complete knowledge base.

Enter at least two characters to begin.
↑↓ select Enter open Browse the full research archive
SecurityWeek AI Security · September 2, 2026

OpenLeash Adds a Human Check to Risky AI Agent Actions

tool Agent SecurityAI EngineeringPrompt Injection
Why it matters

SecurityWeek profiles OpenLeash, an authorization layer that evaluates proposed agent actions and can block them or request human approval. The project’s public repository provides a personal runtime using agent hooks and provider traffic, with a decision engine, local history and desktop integration. Its hosted business control plane is outside that repository. Public implementation materials make it inspectable, while the profile offers no independent efficacy benchmark.

My takeaway: Treat action interception as an enforcement boundary to test. Verify supported tool paths, behavior when the engine is unavailable, direct subprocess and network routes, and whether approval binds to the exact action executed. Review the runtime and deployment model before relying on it for secret protection or destructive-action control.
Keep exploring

More curated notes connected through Agent Security and AI Engineering.

OWASP GenAI Security Project · guide

OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications for 2026

OWASP's community guide organizes agentic-system risk into ten categories, including goal hijacking, tool misuse, identity and privilege abuse, memory poisoning, insecure inter-agent communication, cascading failures, and rogue-agent behavior. It provides a shared taxonomy and mitigation starting point rather than a certification checklist or evidence that a deployed system is secure.

Microsoft Security Blog · guide

AI vulnerability research: measure reproducible findings and completed fixes

Microsoft’s FORGE account describes the work between a model’s vulnerability claim and a useful repair: reusable builds, duplicate removal, reachability checks, project-specific verification, reproducible triggers and regression tests. Structured rejection reasons help improve later searches. The useful operational measure is the flow of findings that survive verification and reach a fix, rather than the number of candidates generated. Reported successful-case costs exclude parts of screening, failed attempts and human work, so they are not the total cost of operating this pipeline.

OpenAI News · framework

Frontier training safety cases: connect evidence to enforced pause and rollback controls

OpenAI proposes training-run safety cases combining alignment evaluations, containment and monitoring with explicit operational ownership. Concrete measures include immutable transcripts, held-out incident tests, checks for evaluation gaming, response deadlines and fail-closed monitoring. Independent internal challenge, leadership vetoes and tracking downstream uses support stopping a run and reversing affected work. The article describes recommendations still being implemented, rather than audited proof that every safeguard already operates or that residual risk has been eliminated.