AI Red Team Engineering notes, research references, and field notes on AI systems, responsible AI, governance, and compliance.
Global search

Search AI Red Team

Search across the complete knowledge base.

Enter at least two characters to begin.
↑↓ select Enter open Browse the full research archive
Internet Society / NDSS · Event date February 23, 2026 - February 27, 2026

NDSS Symposium 2026

event past event AI Red TeamingAdversarial MLAgent Security
Why it matters
February 23, 2026 - February 27, 2026
Event archive

NDSS 2026 combined systems-security research with dedicated AI-security sessions and the co-located LAST-X workshop on LLM-assisted security and trust exploration. The archived program includes attacks on LLM availability and alignment, watermark robustness, AI-enabled phishing defenses, adversarial ML, and evaluations of LLMs used in security work.

My takeaway: The archive offers papers, slides, and videos that can seed adversarial test cases. Separate attacks on models from attacks on complete applications, verify whether demonstrations survive realistic constraints, and track how LLM-assisted defensive tools are evaluated for false confidence, poisoning, and operator misuse.
Keep exploring

More curated notes connected through AI Red Teaming and Adversarial ML.

OpenAI News · framework

OpenAI’s Frontier Governance Framework

OpenAI's 22-page Frontier Governance Framework maps its frontier-model processes to California's Transparency in Frontier AI Act and the EU AI Act's general-purpose AI code. It documents lifecycle risk assessment, cyber-offense and other risk tiers, mitigation and residual-risk decisions, critical-incident handling, security risk management, model reporting, external review, responsibility allocation, and change control.

OWASP GenAI Security Project · guide

OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications for 2026

OWASP's community guide organizes agentic-system risk into ten categories, including goal hijacking, tool misuse, identity and privilege abuse, memory poisoning, insecure inter-agent communication, cascading failures, and rogue-agent behavior. It provides a shared taxonomy and mitigation starting point rather than a certification checklist or evidence that a deployed system is secure.

OECD.AI Wonk · guide

A five-step roadmap to closing the AI evaluation gap

The roadmap addresses evaluation results that overstate real-world performance or fail to transfer across deployment contexts. Its five steps balance standardized and local tests, evaluate throughout the lifecycle, build qualified assurance and communication capacity, tailor tests to each value-chain actor and technology, and use a coordinated, trusted process for updating methods.