Håkon Måløy · July 30, 2026

Context Collapse: hidden Word prompts propagate through Copilot-generated documents

Why it matters

Håkon Måløy demonstrates a cross-domain prompt-injection chain in Microsoft 365 Copilot for Word: hidden instructions in an external document alter a generated report and copy themselves into the output, which becomes a trusted carrier in later drafting sessions. Microsoft confirmed the behavior and deployed payload-specific mitigations, but Måløy reproduced the attack class after 144 days of coordinated disclosure; each hop still requires another Copilot drafting or editing operation.

My takeaway: Treat AI-generated office documents as potentially active carriers, not sanitized outputs. Preserve source and edit provenance, surface model changes, inspect hidden content, isolate external documents from high-impact drafting, and require review before reuse. Regression tests should cover semantic payload variants and multi-hop propagation; prompt blocklists or model upgrades alone are not class-level fixes.
Keep exploring

More curated notes connected through Prompt Injection and Agent Security.

OpenAI News · framework

OpenAI’s Frontier Governance Framework

OpenAI's 22-page Frontier Governance Framework maps its frontier-model processes to California's Transparency in Frontier AI Act and the EU AI Act's general-purpose AI code. It documents lifecycle risk assessment, cyber-offense and other risk tiers, mitigation and residual-risk decisions, critical-incident handling, security risk management, model reporting, external review, responsibility allocation, and change control.

OWASP GenAI Security Project · guide

OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications for 2026

OWASP's community guide organizes agentic-system risk into ten categories, including goal hijacking, tool misuse, identity and privilege abuse, memory poisoning, insecure inter-agent communication, cascading failures, and rogue-agent behavior. It provides a shared taxonomy and mitigation starting point rather than a certification checklist or evidence that a deployed system is secure.

OECD.AI Wonk · guide

A five-step roadmap to closing the AI evaluation gap

The roadmap addresses evaluation results that overstate real-world performance or fail to transfer across deployment contexts. Its five steps balance standardized and local tests, evaluate throughout the lifecycle, build qualified assurance and communication capacity, tailor tests to each value-chain actor and technology, and use a coordinated, trusted process for updating methods.