AI Red Team Engineering notes, research references, and field notes on AI systems, responsible AI, governance, and compliance.
Global search

Search AI Red Team

Search across the complete knowledge base.

Enter at least two characters to begin.
↑↓ select Enter open Browse the full research archive
Google DeepMind Blog · July 21, 2026

Introducing Gemini 3.6 Flash, 3.5 Flash-Lite, and 3.5 Flash Cyber

news Model EvaluationAgent SecurityAI Engineering
Why it matters

Google introduced Gemini 3.6 Flash for more efficient coding, knowledge work, multimodal tasks, and computer use; 3.5 Flash-Lite for high-throughput, low-latency agent workflows; and 3.5 Flash Cyber for vulnerability research inside CodeMender. Google reports lower token use for 3.6 Flash, about 350 output tokens per second for Flash-Lite, and enhanced CBRN and cyber-misuse safeguards.

My takeaway: The three variants optimize different constraints, so selection should be workload-specific. Reproduce quality, latency, token, tool-call, refusal, and safety results on your own tasks; define rollback criteria; and apply tighter access controls to computer-use and cyber-capable deployments than headline benchmark scores imply.
Keep exploring

More curated notes connected through Model Evaluation and Agent Security.

OpenAI News · framework

OpenAI’s Frontier Governance Framework

OpenAI's 22-page Frontier Governance Framework maps its frontier-model processes to California's Transparency in Frontier AI Act and the EU AI Act's general-purpose AI code. It documents lifecycle risk assessment, cyber-offense and other risk tiers, mitigation and residual-risk decisions, critical-incident handling, security risk management, model reporting, external review, responsibility allocation, and change control.

OWASP GenAI Security Project · guide

OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications for 2026

OWASP's community guide organizes agentic-system risk into ten categories, including goal hijacking, tool misuse, identity and privilege abuse, memory poisoning, insecure inter-agent communication, cascading failures, and rogue-agent behavior. It provides a shared taxonomy and mitigation starting point rather than a certification checklist or evidence that a deployed system is secure.

OECD.AI Wonk · guide

A five-step roadmap to closing the AI evaluation gap

The roadmap addresses evaluation results that overstate real-world performance or fail to transfer across deployment contexts. Its five steps balance standardized and local tests, evaluate throughout the lifecycle, build qualified assurance and communication capacity, tailor tests to each value-chain actor and technology, and use a coordinated, trusted process for updating methods.