AI Red Team Engineering notes, research references, and field notes on AI systems, responsible AI, governance, and compliance.
Global search

Search AI Red Team

Search across the complete knowledge base.

Enter at least two characters to begin.
↑↓ select Enter open Browse the full research archive
Adversa AI Trusted AI Blog · April 23, 2026

Interleaved in-context learning as a structural jailbreak technique

analysis Adversarial MLAI Red TeamingModel Evaluation
Why it matters

Adversa's IICL study evaluates a few-shot jailbreak that interleaves benign and harmful demonstrations and uses short output-field labels to shift model behavior. Across more than 3,500 probes, ten models, and seven ablations, results vary materially with example order and field names; the work is vendor-authored and its model-specific attack rates should be independently reproduced.

My takeaway: Add structural few-shot attacks to safety regression suites, vary demonstration order, labels, templates, and model versions, and report both per-query and per-attempt success with uncertainty. Keep a held-out attack set and rerun it after every system-prompt, scaffold, or model change.
Keep exploring

More curated notes connected through Adversarial ML and AI Red Teaming.

OpenAI News · framework

OpenAI’s Frontier Governance Framework

OpenAI's 22-page Frontier Governance Framework maps its frontier-model processes to California's Transparency in Frontier AI Act and the EU AI Act's general-purpose AI code. It documents lifecycle risk assessment, cyber-offense and other risk tiers, mitigation and residual-risk decisions, critical-incident handling, security risk management, model reporting, external review, responsibility allocation, and change control.

OWASP GenAI Security Project · guide

OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications for 2026

OWASP's community guide organizes agentic-system risk into ten categories, including goal hijacking, tool misuse, identity and privilege abuse, memory poisoning, insecure inter-agent communication, cascading failures, and rogue-agent behavior. It provides a shared taxonomy and mitigation starting point rather than a certification checklist or evidence that a deployed system is secure.

OECD.AI Wonk · guide

A five-step roadmap to closing the AI evaluation gap

The roadmap addresses evaluation results that overstate real-world performance or fail to transfer across deployment contexts. Its five steps balance standardized and local tests, evaluate throughout the lifecycle, build qualified assurance and communication capacity, tailor tests to each value-chain actor and technology, and use a coordinated, trusted process for updating methods.