CAMLIS · November 14, 2025

Importing Phantoms: Measuring LLM Package Hallucination Vulnerabilities

Importing Phantoms: Measuring LLM Package Hallucination Vulnerabilities video thumbnail
Why it matters

Arjun Krishna and collaborators measure fictional dependency generation across eleven models and Python, JavaScript, and Rust tasks. They find that package-hallucination behavior varies with the model, language, size, and request specificity, creating a supply-chain opening when an attacker registers a plausible package name suggested by an AI coding system.

My takeaway: Treat every AI-suggested dependency as untrusted until the registry owner, publication history, source repository, license, integrity hash, and malware checks are verified. Route installs through an approved registry, lock and hash dependencies, block first-seen packages by default, and regression-test coding models across every supported language and task family.
Keep exploring

More curated notes connected through AI Red Teaming and Agent Security.

OpenAI News · framework

OpenAI’s Frontier Governance Framework

OpenAI's 22-page Frontier Governance Framework maps its frontier-model processes to California's Transparency in Frontier AI Act and the EU AI Act's general-purpose AI code. It documents lifecycle risk assessment, cyber-offense and other risk tiers, mitigation and residual-risk decisions, critical-incident handling, security risk management, model reporting, external review, responsibility allocation, and change control.

OWASP GenAI Security Project · guide

OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications for 2026

OWASP's community guide organizes agentic-system risk into ten categories, including goal hijacking, tool misuse, identity and privilege abuse, memory poisoning, insecure inter-agent communication, cascading failures, and rogue-agent behavior. It provides a shared taxonomy and mitigation starting point rather than a certification checklist or evidence that a deployed system is secure.

OECD.AI Wonk · guide

A five-step roadmap to closing the AI evaluation gap

The roadmap addresses evaluation results that overstate real-world performance or fail to transfer across deployment contexts. Its five steps balance standardized and local tests, evaluate throughout the lifecycle, build qualified assurance and communication capacity, tailor tests to each value-chain actor and technology, and use a coordinated, trusted process for updating methods.