AI Red Team Engineering notes, research references, and field notes on AI systems, responsible AI, governance, and compliance.
Global search

Search AI Red Team

Search across the complete knowledge base.

Enter at least two characters to begin.
↑↓ select Enter open Browse the full research archive
NVIDIA AI Red Team · November 3, 2025

How Code Execution Drives Key Risks in Agentic AI Systems

analysis AI Red TeamingAgent SecurityPrompt Injection
Why it matters

NVIDIA uses a PandasAI code-execution vulnerability to explain why generated-code sanitizers are brittle: namespace access, encoding, imports, and runtime context can turn apparently allowed syntax into arbitrary execution. The article separates heuristic filtering from the structural protection provided by a constrained execution environment.

My takeaway: Treat generated code as untrusted and execute it in an ephemeral, per-user sandbox with no sensitive mounts, minimal credentials, resource limits, and denied-by-default egress. Keep static or LLM-based sanitization as defense in depth, then destroy the environment and retain an auditable record of code and side effects.
Keep exploring

More curated notes connected through AI Red Teaming and Agent Security.

OpenAI News · framework

OpenAI’s Frontier Governance Framework

OpenAI's 22-page Frontier Governance Framework maps its frontier-model processes to California's Transparency in Frontier AI Act and the EU AI Act's general-purpose AI code. It documents lifecycle risk assessment, cyber-offense and other risk tiers, mitigation and residual-risk decisions, critical-incident handling, security risk management, model reporting, external review, responsibility allocation, and change control.

OWASP GenAI Security Project · guide

OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications for 2026

OWASP's community guide organizes agentic-system risk into ten categories, including goal hijacking, tool misuse, identity and privilege abuse, memory poisoning, insecure inter-agent communication, cascading failures, and rogue-agent behavior. It provides a shared taxonomy and mitigation starting point rather than a certification checklist or evidence that a deployed system is secure.

OECD.AI Wonk · guide

A five-step roadmap to closing the AI evaluation gap

The roadmap addresses evaluation results that overstate real-world performance or fail to transfer across deployment contexts. Its five steps balance standardized and local tests, evaluate throughout the lifecycle, build qualified assurance and communication capacity, tailor tests to each value-chain actor and technology, and use a coordinated, trusted process for updating methods.