AI Red Team Engineering notes, research references, and field notes on AI systems, responsible AI, governance, and compliance.
Global search

Search AI Red Team

Search across the complete knowledge base.

Enter at least two characters to begin.
↑↓ select Enter open Browse the full research archive
garak Releases · February 4, 2026

garak v0.14.0

tool AI Red TeamingAdversarial MLModel Evaluation
Why it matters

garak 0.14.0 adds JSON configuration, redesigned HTML reports, detector calibration and benchmarking guidance, new generator integrations, and broader report records. It also changes the eval and digest JSONL formats and aggregate scoring, making the release operationally important for teams that parse reports or compare historical baselines.

My takeaway: Pin the garak version in repeatable evaluations, update report parsers for the new schema, and run a fixed calibration corpus before and after upgrading. Record probe, detector, generator, configuration, and tool versions with every result; do not compare old and new aggregate scores without validating the scoring change.
Keep exploring

More curated notes connected through AI Red Teaming and Adversarial ML.

OpenAI News · framework

OpenAI’s Frontier Governance Framework

OpenAI's 22-page Frontier Governance Framework maps its frontier-model processes to California's Transparency in Frontier AI Act and the EU AI Act's general-purpose AI code. It documents lifecycle risk assessment, cyber-offense and other risk tiers, mitigation and residual-risk decisions, critical-incident handling, security risk management, model reporting, external review, responsibility allocation, and change control.

OWASP GenAI Security Project · guide

OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications for 2026

OWASP's community guide organizes agentic-system risk into ten categories, including goal hijacking, tool misuse, identity and privilege abuse, memory poisoning, insecure inter-agent communication, cascading failures, and rogue-agent behavior. It provides a shared taxonomy and mitigation starting point rather than a certification checklist or evidence that a deployed system is secure.

OECD.AI Wonk · guide

A five-step roadmap to closing the AI evaluation gap

The roadmap addresses evaluation results that overstate real-world performance or fail to transfer across deployment contexts. Its five steps balance standardized and local tests, evaluate throughout the lifecycle, build qualified assurance and communication capacity, tailor tests to each value-chain actor and technology, and use a coordinated, trusted process for updating methods.