AI Red Team Engineering notes, research references, and field notes on AI systems, responsible AI, governance, and compliance.
Global search

Search AI Red Team

Search across the complete knowledge base.

Enter at least two characters to begin.
↑↓ select Enter open Browse the full research archive
Microsoft Security Blog · March 12, 2026

Detecting and analyzing prompt abuse in AI tools

guide Prompt InjectionAgent Security
Why it matters

Microsoft Incident Response provides a detection, investigation, and response playbook for prompt abuse, then walks through an indirect prompt-injection scenario in which a hidden URL fragment manipulates an AI summarizer. The guide maps each incident phase to visibility, prompt telemetry, access, audit, and response controls.

My takeaway: Recreate the hidden-fragment scenario against a test assistant and verify what the application logs at ingestion, model invocation, retrieval, file access, and output. Correlate external URLs with prompt and data-access telemetry, sanitize fragments and metadata deterministically, constrain sensitive access, document containment steps, and retain the case as a detection regression.
Keep exploring

More curated notes connected through Prompt Injection and Agent Security.

OWASP GenAI Security Project · guide

OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications for 2026

OWASP's community guide organizes agentic-system risk into ten categories, including goal hijacking, tool misuse, identity and privilege abuse, memory poisoning, insecure inter-agent communication, cascading failures, and rogue-agent behavior. It provides a shared taxonomy and mitigation starting point rather than a certification checklist or evidence that a deployed system is secure.

OpenAI News · framework

Frontier training safety cases: connect evidence to enforced pause and rollback controls

OpenAI proposes training-run safety cases combining alignment evaluations, containment and monitoring with explicit operational ownership. Concrete measures include immutable transcripts, held-out incident tests, checks for evaluation gaming, response deadlines and fail-closed monitoring. Independent internal challenge, leadership vetoes and tracking downstream uses support stopping a run and reversing affected work. The article describes recommendations still being implemented, rather than audited proof that every safeguard already operates or that residual risk has been eliminated.

OECD.AI Wonk · guide

A five-step roadmap to closing the AI evaluation gap

The roadmap addresses evaluation results that overstate real-world performance or fail to transfer across deployment contexts. Its five steps balance standardized and local tests, evaluate throughout the lifecycle, build qualified assurance and communication capacity, tailor tests to each value-chain actor and technology, and use a coordinated, trusted process for updating methods.