AI Red Team Engineering notes, research references, and field notes on AI systems, responsible AI, governance, and compliance.
Global search

Search AI Red Team

Search across the complete knowledge base.

Enter at least two characters to begin.
↑↓ select Enter open Browse the full research archive
OECD.AI Wonk · March 1, 2026

Deadline extension 20 March: Global call for ‘Governing with Artificial Intelligence’: Share your initiatives and insights on AI-driven innovation in government

news AI Compliance
Why it matters

OECD launches a Global Call for Governing with AI, inviting governments to share AI use cases, policy initiatives, and implementation tools to support trustworthy AI in public administration.

My takeaway: Deadline extension 20 March: Global call for ‘Governing with Artificial Intelligence’: Share your initiatives and insights on AI-driven innovation in government is a governance signal. The practical read is to map the policy language into controls, audit evidence, ownership, and reporting expectations for deployed AI s
Keep exploring

More curated notes connected through AI Compliance.

OpenAI News · framework

OpenAI’s Frontier Governance Framework

OpenAI's 22-page Frontier Governance Framework maps its frontier-model processes to California's Transparency in Frontier AI Act and the EU AI Act's general-purpose AI code. It documents lifecycle risk assessment, cyber-offense and other risk tiers, mitigation and residual-risk decisions, critical-incident handling, security risk management, model reporting, external review, responsibility allocation, and change control.

OpenAI News · framework

Cybersecurity in the Intelligence Age

OpenAI proposes a five-pillar strategy for AI-enabled cyber defense: tiered access for trusted defenders, faster government-industry coordination, stronger protection of frontier models and infrastructure, risk-scaled deployment monitoring, and broader defensive support for individuals and small organizations.

OECD.AI Wonk · guide

A five-step roadmap to closing the AI evaluation gap

The roadmap addresses evaluation results that overstate real-world performance or fail to transfer across deployment contexts. Its five steps balance standardized and local tests, evaluate throughout the lifecycle, build qualified assurance and communication capacity, tailor tests to each value-chain actor and technology, and use a coordinated, trusted process for updating methods.