CAMLIS · November 14, 2025

BlackIce: A Containerized Red Teaming Toolkit for AI Security Testing

video AI Red Teaming Adversarial ML Model Evaluation AI Engineering

BlackIce: A Containerized Red Teaming Toolkit for AI Security Testing video thumbnail

Why it matters

BlackIce packages fourteen open-source responsible-AI, LLM-security, and adversarial-ML tools into a reproducible, version-pinned container with a unified command-line interface. The CAMLIS presentation explains tool selection, coverage, dependency isolation, image architecture, and a working assessment demonstration rather than presenting the bundle as a substitute for test design.

My takeaway: Pin the image digest and preserve its software inventory with every assessment, isolate the container from production credentials and unrestricted egress, and record tool configuration, seeds, model versions, and outputs. Map each tool to an explicit threat scenario so a convenient bundle does not become unexamined coverage theater.

Keep exploring

More curated notes connected through AI Red Teaming and Adversarial ML.

OpenAI News · framework

OpenAI’s Frontier Governance Framework

OpenAI's 22-page Frontier Governance Framework maps its frontier-model processes to California's Transparency in Frontier AI Act and the EU AI Act's general-purpose AI code. It documents lifecycle risk assessment, cyber-offense and other risk tiers, mitigation and residual-risk decisions, critical-incident handling, security risk management, model reporting, external review, responsibility allocation, and change control.

OWASP GenAI Security Project · guide

OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications for 2026

OWASP's community guide organizes agentic-system risk into ten categories, including goal hijacking, tool misuse, identity and privilege abuse, memory poisoning, insecure inter-agent communication, cascading failures, and rogue-agent behavior. It provides a shared taxonomy and mitigation starting point rather than a certification checklist or evidence that a deployed system is secure.

OECD.AI Wonk · guide

A five-step roadmap to closing the AI evaluation gap

The roadmap addresses evaluation results that overstate real-world performance or fail to transfer across deployment contexts. Its five steps balance standardized and local tests, evaluate throughout the lifecycle, build qualified assurance and communication capacity, tailor tests to each value-chain actor and technology, and use a coordinated, trusted process for updating methods.