AI Red Team Engineering notes, research references, and field notes on AI systems, responsible AI, governance, and compliance.
Global search

Search AI Red Team

Search across the complete knowledge base.

Enter at least two characters to begin.
↑↓ select Enter open Browse the full research archive
IEEE ACSAC · Event date December 7, 2026 - December 11, 2026

IEEE ACSAC 2026

event upcoming Agent SecurityAdversarial MLAI Red Teaming
Why it matters
December 7, 2026 - December 11, 2026
Scheduled event

The Annual Computer Security Applications Conference brings applied security research to Los Angeles and includes four especially relevant workshops: agentic AI in offensive and defensive cyber operations, trustworthy machine learning, security and safety of AI in biotechnology, and AI for cyber-threat intelligence.

My takeaway: Treat the workshops as distinct evidence streams rather than one generic AI track. Compare offensive automation with containment and attribution controls, verify trustworthy-ML claims against explicit attackers, and apply stricter capability and consequence thresholds to biological and autonomous-security use cases.
Keep exploring

More curated notes connected through Agent Security and Adversarial ML.

OpenAI News · framework

OpenAI’s Frontier Governance Framework

OpenAI's 22-page Frontier Governance Framework maps its frontier-model processes to California's Transparency in Frontier AI Act and the EU AI Act's general-purpose AI code. It documents lifecycle risk assessment, cyber-offense and other risk tiers, mitigation and residual-risk decisions, critical-incident handling, security risk management, model reporting, external review, responsibility allocation, and change control.

OWASP GenAI Security Project · guide

OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications for 2026

OWASP's community guide organizes agentic-system risk into ten categories, including goal hijacking, tool misuse, identity and privilege abuse, memory poisoning, insecure inter-agent communication, cascading failures, and rogue-agent behavior. It provides a shared taxonomy and mitigation starting point rather than a certification checklist or evidence that a deployed system is secure.

OECD.AI Wonk · guide

A five-step roadmap to closing the AI evaluation gap

The roadmap addresses evaluation results that overstate real-world performance or fail to transfer across deployment contexts. Its five steps balance standardized and local tests, evaluate throughout the lifecycle, build qualified assurance and communication capacity, tailor tests to each value-chain actor and technology, and use a coordinated, trusted process for updating methods.