AI Red Team Engineering notes, research references, and field notes on AI systems, responsible AI, governance, and compliance.
Global search

Search AI Red Team

Search across the complete knowledge base.

Enter at least two characters to begin.
↑↓ select Enter open Browse the full research archive
ACM AISec · Event date November 15, 2026

ACM AISec 2026

event upcoming Adversarial MLAI Red TeamingAgent Security
Why it matters
November 15, 2026
Scheduled event

The 19th ACM Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Security takes place November 15 alongside ACM CCS in The Hague. It covers adversarial ML, model privacy, AI misuse, foundation-model red teaming, dangerous-capability evaluation, deceptive alignment, multi-agent risk, and autonomous-agent containment; the same workshop day also includes AGENT-SEC, LAMPS, and 3D-Sec.

My takeaway: AISec is a high-value research pipeline because accepted work must state its threat model and is published archivally. Review its program alongside the adjacent agent-security, large-model privacy and safety, and deepfake-security workshops; prioritize papers with released artifacts and adaptive attackers.
Keep exploring

More curated notes connected through Adversarial ML and AI Red Teaming.

OpenAI News · framework

OpenAI’s Frontier Governance Framework

OpenAI's 22-page Frontier Governance Framework maps its frontier-model processes to California's Transparency in Frontier AI Act and the EU AI Act's general-purpose AI code. It documents lifecycle risk assessment, cyber-offense and other risk tiers, mitigation and residual-risk decisions, critical-incident handling, security risk management, model reporting, external review, responsibility allocation, and change control.

OWASP GenAI Security Project · guide

OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications for 2026

OWASP's community guide organizes agentic-system risk into ten categories, including goal hijacking, tool misuse, identity and privilege abuse, memory poisoning, insecure inter-agent communication, cascading failures, and rogue-agent behavior. It provides a shared taxonomy and mitigation starting point rather than a certification checklist or evidence that a deployed system is secure.

OECD.AI Wonk · guide

A five-step roadmap to closing the AI evaluation gap

The roadmap addresses evaluation results that overstate real-world performance or fail to transfer across deployment contexts. Its five steps balance standardized and local tests, evaluate throughout the lifecycle, build qualified assurance and communication capacity, tailor tests to each value-chain actor and technology, and use a coordinated, trusted process for updating methods.