CAMLIS · November 14, 2025

Accelerating AI Red Teaming Operations With PyRIT

video AI Red Teaming Model Evaluation Prompt Injection Agent Security

Accelerating AI Red Teaming Operations With PyRIT video thumbnail

Why it matters

Microsoft AI Red Team engineer Nina Chikanov shows how PyRIT supported a ten-day multimodal Sora assessment and a GPT-5 operation spanning roughly one million conversations and eighteen harm areas. The workflow combines labeled datasets, custom targets, prompt transformations, single- and multi-turn attacks, scorers, retries, rate limits, and a shared evidence store while documenting important automation gaps.

My takeaway: Build repeatable operations from versioned datasets, target adapters, transformations, scoring criteria, and retained conversations. Calibrate automated scorers against human review, label results by harm area, budget time for custom targets, and keep manual paths for video, UI, agentic, application-security, and other scenarios that PyRIT cannot evaluate reliably.

Keep exploring

More curated notes connected through AI Red Teaming and Model Evaluation.

OpenAI News · framework

OpenAI’s Frontier Governance Framework

OpenAI's 22-page Frontier Governance Framework maps its frontier-model processes to California's Transparency in Frontier AI Act and the EU AI Act's general-purpose AI code. It documents lifecycle risk assessment, cyber-offense and other risk tiers, mitigation and residual-risk decisions, critical-incident handling, security risk management, model reporting, external review, responsibility allocation, and change control.

OWASP GenAI Security Project · guide

OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications for 2026

OWASP's community guide organizes agentic-system risk into ten categories, including goal hijacking, tool misuse, identity and privilege abuse, memory poisoning, insecure inter-agent communication, cascading failures, and rogue-agent behavior. It provides a shared taxonomy and mitigation starting point rather than a certification checklist or evidence that a deployed system is secure.

OECD.AI Wonk · guide

A five-step roadmap to closing the AI evaluation gap

The roadmap addresses evaluation results that overstate real-world performance or fail to transfer across deployment contexts. Its five steps balance standardized and local tests, evaluate throughout the lifecycle, build qualified assurance and communication capacity, tailor tests to each value-chain actor and technology, and use a coordinated, trusted process for updating methods.