Adversa AI Trusted AI Blog · July 30, 2026

A hole in every one: bypassing the open source AI skill scanners

Why it matters

Adversa tested eight open-source AI skill scanners with paired unobfuscated and obfuscated malicious skills, finding that every scanner passed an attack through either a true bypass, a blind spot, or an injectable model judge. The study covers encoding, Unicode, command reconstruction, truncation, allowlists, bundled files, paraphrase, and remote stages; its 4,000-skill benign set also found no scanner beat an always-block baseline on F1. Most tools ran offline without optional model triage, and some were reconstructed from retained artifacts.

My takeaway: Treat a clean skill scan as advisory, not authorization to install. Evaluate scanners with control pairs and adaptive attacks; decode, normalize, canonicalize, and rescan content; inspect every bundled file and language; disclose skipped or truncated coverage; and keep a deterministic severity floor beneath model judges. Pair scanning with curated sources, pinned versions, sandboxing, restricted egress, and secrets kept outside the agent runtime.
Keep exploring

More curated notes connected through Agent Security and AI Red Teaming.

OpenAI News · framework

OpenAI’s Frontier Governance Framework

OpenAI's 22-page Frontier Governance Framework maps its frontier-model processes to California's Transparency in Frontier AI Act and the EU AI Act's general-purpose AI code. It documents lifecycle risk assessment, cyber-offense and other risk tiers, mitigation and residual-risk decisions, critical-incident handling, security risk management, model reporting, external review, responsibility allocation, and change control.

OWASP GenAI Security Project · guide

OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications for 2026

OWASP's community guide organizes agentic-system risk into ten categories, including goal hijacking, tool misuse, identity and privilege abuse, memory poisoning, insecure inter-agent communication, cascading failures, and rogue-agent behavior. It provides a shared taxonomy and mitigation starting point rather than a certification checklist or evidence that a deployed system is secure.

OECD.AI Wonk · guide

A five-step roadmap to closing the AI evaluation gap

The roadmap addresses evaluation results that overstate real-world performance or fail to transfer across deployment contexts. Its five steps balance standardized and local tests, evaluate throughout the lifecycle, build qualified assurance and communication capacity, tailor tests to each value-chain actor and technology, and use a coordinated, trusted process for updating methods.